- Duke of Aberdeen noted that Swedish-originated Metro has raked in profits of HK$20-30 million precisely because it is apolitical, whereas Headline News will not be able to refrain from meddling in politics due to its parentage (the Sing Tao group).
- Florence Lai (Over the Rainbow) discussed about how the human resources for Headline News were allocated. Mostly, they will be Sing Tao people helping out on a temporary basis.
- Florence Lai (Over the Rainbow) is a reporter by profession, and she compared the two free newspapers according to reporting styles with illustrative examples. She offered the example of the decision to stop live horserace broadcasts at Radio Hong Kong, which is an objective fact. However, a traditional journalist cannot offer his/her own opinion on this decision because that would be subjective. Instead, he/she needs to speak to other parties to elicit their opinions. This is interesting because surely the decision of which third parties to talk to must be subjective as well.
- Miss Lee in Summer provided a common reader's viewpoint, and she is definitely not happy about the aggravation. She concluded: "This is a free society and commerce operates freely. You can publish whatever you want to, and I can refuse to read whatever I don't want to."These are interesting blog comments, but they seemed to be only scratching the surface. As a reader, I personally don't find the summaries terribly interesting and I would need to follow through on the links. But a non-Chinese-reading reader will not be able to follow through with those links. Somehow, my sense is that if one is really interested in the subject, this English-language blogpost at Dustless Workshop is superior to the reading of the bridge blogger's summary. Instead of bridge blogging, I would have done an English-language blog post instead to articulate my own and as well as other viewpoints.
As an individual person, I think that the more interesting blog post would be about my meeting with the Metro managemet in Santiago de Chile in which they explained their business model and distribution strategy to me. And I can also tell you more than two or three things about the readership characteristics of free vs. paid newspapers that may affect their survivability.
So how shall I spend my time? Bridge blogging? Blogging for myself? Or consultancy for money? Hmmm ... is there even a choice?
P.S. Dustless Workship: In reply to EastSouthWestNorth...plus some thoughts... "I personality found that very interesting, and should ESWN decided to write about the two topics he outlined, I will certainly be the first one to read them." Alas, that will not happen as discussion of the first topic implies betrayal of trust while the second topic involves commercial interests.
A post like "Let's hold multiparty elections" is deleted before posting or soon after. But more crucial is the party's channeling of chat-room discussions to serve its own interests. The pattern began in 1999, when an American B-2 bomber dropped five 2,000-pound bombs on the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade. State-run media immediately used the Internet to suggest that the bombing was no mistake. As anti-American riots erupted, the People's Daily, China's largest Communist Party-owned newspaper, created a Web chat forum to denounce the bombing. Thanks to these efforts, today an astonishing number of Chinese still believe that the bombing was a deliberate attack, and chat-room-fired protests against the United States or Japan are a regular fixture. When China captured a U.S. spy plane in 2001, the government encouraged posts like, "If little Bush goes on squawking, we should rope together his 24 white pigs and parade them through the streets."
Here are the closing paragraphs of the Body and Soul blog post:
This is intriguing not just for what it says about the limitations of free speech in China, but also because of its insight into how political conversation works in this country. Outrage of Newsweek's uncrossed t's and undotted i's in the Koran desecration story sweeps real revelations about torture under the mat. Spitting and sputtering about Eason Jordan makes it harder to be taken seriously when you talk about the clear evidence of targeting at least some media workers. And it's not only in the press, but also in blog posts, which can be nearly as bad as the corporate media when it comes to jumping on the latest hot story.
Blogs increase free speech. They amplify small voices. But at the same time, they increase the ability of intellectual bullies to shove the conversation in directions they want it to go. Is free speech on the internet, whether in China or anywhere else, something of an illusion?
The occasion was a public apology (and donation to the Arizona Burn Center's Foundation for Burns and Trauma) after American Media Inc.'s Weekly World News named Phoenix police officer Jason Schechterle (who was tragically burned and disfigured four years ago when a taxicab rammed into his patrol car, which burst into flames) one of the 10 ugliest people in the world.
There are a great many adjectives that come to mind for the kind of journalism practiced by a publication (or company) which could dream up such a bottom-feeding idea as a list of the 10 ugliest people in the world, but "quality" isn't one of them. And it doesn't matter who got fired, or how quickly they pulled the issues off the newsstands, the fact that it was considered a viable story idea in the first place is nearly as repugnant as featuring the likeness of a police officer disfigured in the line of duty. And one can never be sure the donation and apology weren't the most expeditious ways of avoiding what was sure to be a breath-taking lawsuit.
You can't help but think that H. L. Mencken's "No one ever went broke under-estimating the taste of the American public" is somewhere painted on the entrance way of American Media's newly relocated headquarters.
There is a large sign with the word 'Injustice' (冤) in black-on-white background. In the courtyard, there were six mourning altars lined with flower wreaths for the six dead villagers. The banner across the center read: "In order to carry out the land policy of the central government and to protect the interests of the villagers, they gave up their precious lives." ... The villagers said that the cadres have disappeared since the incident: "They are not cadres from our village. We hadn't elected them!" The office of the village cadres has been turned into a mortuary, with flies everywhere inside. ... By the time that we were allowed to leave, the final words from the local officials to us were: "If the National News Office did not call us and your station director had not come today to fetch you, you couldn't have left here this way."
P.S. I have added just added photographs from another blog to corroborate the Phoenix Weekend story.